|
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
EXPLAINING HOW LIFE WORKS - DISTANT HISTORY |
||
Human beings have an innate need to understand things, it's how we learn and how we teach - just try to teach something that you really don't understand! In explaining things that are difficult to grasp, we have a long history of using what we do sort of know to explain what we really don't. There are other ways to look at this, but one
possible view of human history is that we see Nature in the terms
that make the most sense at a given time. Older societies,
without the technology to strongly affect their worlds, saw their
world in terms of the things that had the Power: Nature
Spirits,
with motivations one might expect from a fusing of human
consciousness but the limitations that come from being wind, or
forests, or the sun above. Later, as humans gained the
ability to manipulate their own environment, as power over Nature
became something in their grasp, the forces of Nature they believed in became much
more human, in form and personality, although much more powerful -
the human gods controlled those larger aspects of the world
in
ways similar to the ways that humans controlled the small aspects of theirs, and
nature
spirits became more human and less powerful. Today, these
explanatory ideas occasionally slip out of the realm of explaining Nature and
becomes something more concerned with Human Nature, with those
aspects of Life and Afterlife that still seem unexplainable, and
the forces conceived are less human and more forces of Consciousness
itself. Meanwhile, centuries of small successes in
explaining this or that piece of the big Nature Puzzle has moved
humanity, or a sizable fraction of it, from seeing Nature as
something that can not really be understood, that must be
explained in supernatural terms, to the conviction that everything
can be broken down into tiny bits and all of the workings
analyzed. We like the feeling that this has moved us somehow
closer to the Truth, and Scientists probably feel some of the same
sense of Specialness that used to be the province of priests, of
being more In The Know than the rest. Are we closer to some
knowable Truth? |
||
|
BUILDING UPON KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATIONS |
||
When we look back from today to ancient times, there's no reason to think that human beings were any simpler or stupider as a group or as individuals than they are today. They did have a much smaller pool of accumulated knowledge to build upon, so you might say that they were more ignorant than we are today. But certain aspects of humanness were undoubtedly just as powerful then as now: the need to know why things happen the way they do, and the need to break information down into manageable and useful bits, and the need to categorize and explain relationships. Of all the abilities humans have in different amounts than other animals, it may be their greater sense of how cause relates to effect that most is the basis of science. You can see aspects of human organization in how people have investigated Nature - we look for family, tribe, and nation types of relationships, in patterns that match patterns in human societies. If Modern Science is a product of "Western Society" - which is arguable, of course - it may just be an outgrowth of the level of structure and coordination and planning needed for continental systems of connected cities and the support infrastructure to have them interact meaningfully with a globe of trade. Historically, early biology was a mixture of a need to
understand the practical - humans showed a practical grasp of
genetics millennia before Mendel began to work out the details -
and a compulsion to grasp the Big Picture. From a simple
level, as the concept that a dog, a wolf, and a fox were different
types of animals but could be joined together in a larger
but definable type of Canines, to a larger but
understandable concept that living things with similar functions
could be placed in groups together - the creatures of the water,
the creatures of the air, the slithering legless things, the
things that grow from the ground, et cetera. It seems a
simplistic way of grouping things together, but one suspects that
it was convenient, and that the ancients who really used the
system probably realized that it had some limitations, as systems
users today do. |
||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Online Introduction to Biology (Advanced)
Copyright 2002 - 2008, Michael McDarby.
Reproduction and/or dissemination without permission is prohibited. Linking to these pages is fine.